Re: 'noreturn' warning in libcruft

[Rik]

On 08/07/2012 12:21 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On  7-Aug-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | That's consistent with what's in dumped into config.h (we don't test for the
> | feature, it's solely based on __GNUC__ definition).
>
> I think it was probably done that way out of laziness.  I hesitate to
> test for __GNUC__ in more places.  I think it would be better to use
> HAVE_ATTR_NORETURN, even if that is (due to more laziness) also
> defined in the config.h header based solely on __GNUC__.  Maybe also
> we should rename the HAVE_GCC_ATTR_NORETURN to be HAVE_ATTR_NORETURN,
> since this might eventually be a feature of more than one compiler.
This seems fine.  It is a niggling little warning so I didn't want to spend
too much time constructing the generalizable solution.

--Rik