[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming libcruft
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming libcruft |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:33:38 -0400 |
On 24-Aug-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| If I may add something, splitting up further will complicate the symbol export
| mechanism.
My proposal is not to split things up further. It's to merge libcruft
and liboctave. The multiple divisions that I proposed are just for
internal convenience when building, same as we now use for building
liboctinterp. These extra convenience libraries are not exposed to
the user. The user would see only liboctave, liboctinterp, and
liboctgui.
jwe
- Renaming libcruft, Rik, 2012/08/24
- Renaming libcruft, John W. Eaton, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, Rik, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, John W. Eaton, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, Rik, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, John W. Eaton, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, Rik, 2012/08/24
- Re: Renaming libcruft, John W. Eaton, 2012/08/25
- Re: Renaming libcruft, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/08/25
- Re: Renaming libcruft, John W. Eaton, 2012/08/25