[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: possible 3.6.3 release
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: possible 3.6.3 release |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Sep 2012 10:46:15 -0700 |
On 09/03/2012 10:00 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 11:56:13 +0200
> From: "c." <address@hidden>
> To: Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: 3.6.3 (Was: where to push simple bugfix)
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> On 6 Aug 2012, at 13:53, Jordi Guti?rrez Hermoso wrote:
>
>>> >>
>>> >> has a simple fix so I believe, in principle,
>>> >> it should go on the stable branch.
>> >
>> > Bugfixes on stable aren't only about the simplicity of the bug but
>> > about its severity. If the bug is serious enough and it potentially
>> > affects enough people, it should go on stable, provided the fix
>> > doesn't break API.
>> >
>>> >> On the other hand, I'm not sure whether
>>> >>
>>> >> a) There will be any 3.6.x release
>>> >> b) After source tree reorganization it is still possible to merge stable
>>> >> to default.
>> >
>> > Yes and yes, I believe. In fact, I think we should release 3.6.3 this
>> > month.
> Hi,
>
> Just a reminder that since this bug-fix (see
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?37033)
> no merge of stable to default seems to have happened.
> Also, what about the 3.6.3 release, is it still planned?
9/3/12
If a 3.6.3 is planned, this bug should also be fixed
(https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?37172). It just requires updating gnulib
on the stable branch.
--Rik
- Re: possible 3.6.3 release,
Rik <=