Re: LLVM not picked up - too old version?

[Max Brister]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Philip Nienhuis
<address@hidden> wrote:
> What version of LLVM is needed these days?
>
> I have llvm 3.0; configure output at the end doesn't mention the llvm
> libs/flags/include but only says something like:
> "JIT compiler for loops: false"
>
> AFAICR a week or two weeks ago it did pick up the llvm stuff (that is, I saw
> the llvm libs/include/flags mentioned in configure's output).
>
> linux Mageia 2, gcc 4.6.3, Pentium M
>
> Philip

LLVM 3.0 should still work, I haven't tested it recently though.
Recently there was a change that requires "--enable-jit" in order for
JIT to be enabled. LLVM_CONFIG now defaults to llvm-config as well.

-- 
Max Brister