[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(
From: |
Alexander Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-( |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:39:39 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
On 11/10/12 1:59 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Benjamin Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 November 2012 12:30, Alexander Hansen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/12 10:14 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>>>> On 10 November 2012 06:03, Jacob Dawid <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> The problem is that we are collecting experience with using VS and by
>>>>>> doing
>>>>>> that we promote non-free software.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also a practical problem with distribution here, since given
>>>>> Visual Studio's non-free nature, our users have to go and chase
>>>>> additional libraries on their own, since we are not free to give them
>>>>> those libraries ourselves.
>>>>>
>>>>> A similar problem occurs with Xcode and free distribution on Mac OS X.
>>>>
>>>> Except that Xcode *doesn't install libraries*.
>>>
>>> It installs headers, right? What's in the "command line tools for
>>> Xcode" that we can't distribute freely?
>>>
>>> - Jordi G. H.
>>
>> I've been meaning look at the copyright for the headers used by Xcode, but
>> keep forgetting. Has anyone taken a peek?
>>
>> Ben
>
> I'm not sure which headers Octave uses when build on MacOS X. I looked
> through several .h files in /usr/include to see what was there. Some include
> a FSF copyright.
>
>> This file is part of GCC.
>>
>> GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
>> the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
>> Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later
>> version.
>>
>> GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
>> WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>> FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
>> for more details.
>>
>> You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free
>> Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
>> 02111-1307, USA. */
>
> Some a FreeBSD Copyright (?)
>
>> // Copyright (c) 1993 The Regents of the University of California.
>> // All rights reserved.
>> //
>> // This code is derived from software contributed to Berkeley by
>> // Kent Williams and Tom Epperly.
>> //
>> // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>> // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>> // are met:
>>
>> // 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>> // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>> // 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>> // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>> // documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
>>
>> // Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
>> // may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>> // without specific prior written permission.
>>
>> // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR
>> // IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED
>> // WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
>> // PURPOSE.
>
> Some the Apple Public Source License (not GPL compatible)
>
>> * This file contains Original Code and/or Modifications of Original Code
>> * as defined in and that are subject to the Apple Public Source License
>> * Version 2.0 (the 'License'). You may not use this file except in
>> * compliance with the License. Please obtain a copy of the License at
>> * http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/ and read it before using this
>> * file.
>> *
>> * The Original Code and all software distributed under the License are
>> * distributed on an 'AS IS' basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER
>> * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AND APPLE HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL SUCH WARRANTIES,
>> * INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
>> * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, QUIET ENJOYMENT OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.
>> * Please see the License for the specific language governing rights and
>> * limitations under the License.
>
> Is there a way to determine which include files Octave uses ?
>
> Ben
>
>
If you use --enable-dependency-tracking at configure time (I don't
remember if that's default or not), that information gets cached in
files in the build tree.
--
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, (continued)
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Israel Herraiz, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Jacob Dawid, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Alexander Hansen, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Alexander Hansen, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Benjamin Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Benjamin Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Alexander Hansen, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Ben Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(,
Alexander Hansen <=
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Ben Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Alexander Hansen, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Ben Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Ben Abbott, 2012/11/10
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Pedro, 2012/11/11
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Pedro, 2012/11/11
- Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Israel Herraiz, 2012/11/11
Re: Result: Octave-UPM on Windows :-(, Philip Nienhuis, 2012/11/10