Re: saving function handles

[Max Brister]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This proposal might make sense, but I don't see how to implement it.
>> Do you have precise suggestions how to do so? How can we know in
>> advance if an absolute or a relative path should be used? Why and when
>> should a relative path be preferred? What should the path be relative
>> to?
>
> Why not save the function code itself? Then you don't need any paths.
>
> M.


That would create issues if you have any persistent variables in your function.


-- 
Max Brister