Re: [OctDev] complex error function

[Steven G. Johnson]

Michael D. Godfrey wrote:
> I just took a look to see if I could recover the URL I saw a couple
> of days ago.  But, could not find it.  Anyhow, the main point was that it
> would appear that the implementation could be done for C99 glibc as
> advertized in the man page

The glibc maintainers almost never want to add new functions that aren't 
standardized in any way, and cerf is NOT part of the C99 standard --- it 
is merely reserved for possible future use, which makes it especially 
unlikely that glibc will accept an implementation until the required 
behavior of the function has been standardized.