Re: [OctDev] complex error function

[Michael D. Godfrey]

On 11/22/12 3:34 AM, Steven G. Johnson wrote:
> So, there is some nonzero chance that they would be interested in cerf 
> and cerfc (although they would probably want single and long-double 
> versions as well).   I posted a query to the glibc maintainers mailing 
> list about this.
>
> (Of course, this wouldn't obviate the desire for such functions in 
> Octave in any case, unless you only want to support this functionality 
> with GNU libc.)
>
> --SGJ
This all sounds good to me.  Both of the above can go ahead in parallel, 
pretty much.
In Octave, most of the elementary functions come from glibc anyhow.

Michael