Re: svmtrain/svmclassify

[Carnë Draug]

On 9 December 2012 20:49, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
> I totally disagree with that policy. We have to provide a good way to
> search for functions, not to stick t the braindead way of classifying
> functions in matlab.

On 9 December 2012 21:17, Daniel J Sebald <address@hidden> wrote:
> I agree that organizing packages on the basis of Matlab's organization isn't
> necessary.

Indirectly, this is the same policy/organization that decides if a
function should go into an Octave Forge package or into Octave core.

Carnë