octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: svmtrain/svmclassify


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: svmtrain/svmclassify
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:14:08 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 12/09/2012 03:59 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
On 9 December 2012 20:49, Juan Pablo Carbajal<address@hidden>  wrote:
I totally disagree with that policy. We have to provide a good way to
search for functions, not to stick t the braindead way of classifying
functions in matlab.

On 9 December 2012 21:17, Daniel J Sebald<address@hidden>  wrote:
I agree that organizing packages on the basis of Matlab's organization isn't
necessary.

Indirectly, this is the same policy/organization that decides if a
function should go into an Octave Forge package or into Octave core.

I'm not understanding.  What is the same policy?  How so indirectly?

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]