[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Precedence : tests... and bugs ?
From: |
Julien Bect |
Subject: |
Re: Precedence : tests... and bugs ? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 06:04:22 -0800 (PST) |
Julien Bect wrote
>
> Michael Goffioul wrote
>> Precedence is established for classes, not objects.
>> Even when constructing a second object of a given class, you change the
>> precedence rules, this will affect all objects of the class, even those
>> already constructed. And if you define a precedence between 2 classes,
>> later on you can't redefine its inverse (afaik it'll generate an error).
> I have started to write tests for the precedence mechanism, since
> test/classes/test_classes.m contains very little about this.
>
> While doing so, I have stumbled upon several weird behaviours that look
> very much like bugs.
>
> I will keep investigating this issue, more on this later.
I have come to the conclusion that there are bugs in inferiorto() and
proposed a patch here :
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?7946
Please tell me what you think about it.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Precedence-tests-and-bugs-tp4649510p4649604.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.