Re: HAVE_FFTW macro

[John W. Eaton]

On 03/17/2013 05:03 AM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:

> Is the "undef" important. The commented-out undef sort of suggests the
> norm is to have HAVE_X defined whereby uncommenting will cause HAVE_X to
> be undefined. That is, instead of uncommenting the line, the action is
> to change the line to
>
> #define HAVE_FFTW3 1
>
> Why not have:
>
> /* Define to 1 if FFTW3 is available. */
> /* #define HAVE_FFTW3 1 */
>
>
> Not super important.

That's a question about autoconf's design, not something for us to 
change only in Octave.

jwe