octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUI won't build with older QScintilla


From: Daniel J Sebald
Subject: Re: GUI won't build with older QScintilla
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:31:16 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16

On 04/04/2013 11:20 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
I just tried today to build at 16431:1766d8655006, and got

     In file included from
     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc:32:

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/lexer-octave-gui.h:29:34: error:
     Qsci/qscilexeroctave.h: No such file or directory

     In file included from
     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc:32:

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/lexer-octave-gui.h:33: error:
     expected class-name before '{' token

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc: In member
     function 'void file_editor_tab::update_lexer()':

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc:215: error: cannot
     convert 'lexer_octave_gui*' to 'QsciLexer*' in assignment

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc: In member
     function 'void file_editor_tab::center_current_line()':

     /oct-src/libgui/src/m-editor/file-editor-tab.cc:1169: error:
     'class QsciScintilla' has no member named 'setFirstVisibleLine'

All of these seem to be related to my older version of QScintilla
(2.4). The cset that seems to have introduced at least part of the new
QScintilla features is

     changeset:   16403:7fa90eb41240
     user:        Torsten<address@hidden>
     date:        Sun Mar 31 23:56:11 2013 +0200
     summary:     gui: individually configurable styles of the editor
                  lexers

More autoconf tests to check for QScintilla features, then?

There is apparently a variable defined for the presence of QScintilla:

#ifdef HAVE_QSCINTILLA

Can that be used?

Or can QScintilla be made a requirement? What is the reason for leaving it out? An alternate editor?

Dan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]