Re: llvm 3.1 vs. 3.2

[Max Brister]

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Michael D. Godfrey <address@hidden> wrote:

On 04/09/2013 12:03 AM, Max Brister wrote:

I had looked into updating JIT to support LLVM 3.2, and it shouldn't be that difficult, it looks like there are some minor API changes. These API changes could be checked for in the configure script.

Thanks.  Something for a break after end-of-semester??

Michael

Yes, hopefully I will have some time to work on Octave after the semester is over. I probably will not have time to implement new features though, and will focus on bug fixes/code cleanup.

--
Max Brister