Re: specfun package cleanup

[Carnë Draug]

On 29 April 2013 15:34, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
> CC'ing octave-maintainers list.
>
> On task #12153, Carnë wrote:
>> Nice. I have removed them from the specfun package.
>
> I was hesitant to remove things since this is still in the development
> version. Specfun now has a few things removed that are moved into
> Octave, should we make it depend on octave >= 3.8.0 to ensure upgrades
> don't lose functionality? And to ensure we don't accidentally make a
> release of specfun before the next Octave goes out?

Yes, dependent on >= 3.8 should be done. I removed those functions now
since specfun is unmaintained, and a new Octave is likely to be
released before specfun.

Carnë