Re: Stepping into local functions no longer works

[John W. Eaton]

On 04/30/2013 03:14 AM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:

> OK, I didn't know dbstop works that way. But I see now. Visually one can
> tell the sub_function, but for the editor to figure that out isn't so
> easy. Keep in mind the editor window contents could be modified. Maybe
> the subfunction boundary is a case where an invisible marker could be used.

If the editor window contents are modified and the modified file is 
saved, the breakpoints will be cleared when it is parsed again.

I know you want to try to do some tricks to save and restore breakpoints 
when the file changes, but I'm not convinced that it makes sense to 
attempt to do that.  The contents of the file can change so that the new 
file is nothing like the old.  Why should breakpoints be preserved in 
that case?

jwe