octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GSOC 2013 - FEM LIBRARY


From: Júlio Hoffimann
Subject: Re: GSOC 2013 - FEM LIBRARY
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 14:43:37 -0300


I don't think we need multiple namespaces for Octave.  Am I wrong?

If we use just one, what should it be?  Octave? octave? octave_org or perhaps org_octave (for the Java fans among us)?

jwe

John,

Why not a shorter 3-char name like "oct"?

oct::array<T>
oct::operators::add<T,U> (read altogether as "octoperators", cool huh?!)

Best,
Júlio.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]