Re: building default not possible?

[Torsten]

On 09.07.2013 04:16, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 20:12, Torsten <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...] but there are still a bunch of warnings during
>> compilation of __magick_read__.cc:
>>
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:406:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:406:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'nargout' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:874:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1010:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1157:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1215:1: warning: unused
>> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
>> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:378:1: warning: 'void
>> maybe_initialize_magick()' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 
> And you didn't had those warnings before? The missing include was my
> fault, but those warnings come from parts I didn't touch. They seem to
> warn about arguments that are used only if you HAVE_MAGICK (and you
> don't). Same for maybe_initialize_magick() which does nothing in your
> case. Should I enclose the whole thing in a ifdef HAVE_MAGICK, rather
> than just the code inside?
> 
> Carnë
> 

I am not sure about the warning but I didn't become aware of it before.

Torsten