Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m

[PhilipNienhuis]

bpabbott wrote
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:09 PM, PhilipNienhuis wrote:
> 
>> bpabbott wrote
>>> Using your scripts, the result doesn't look as bad as what you posted.
>> <http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave.png> 
>> 
>> Yep; remarkably. I really don't follow why your result is so much better
>> with the same script.
>> 
>> The plots I posted were the same on Windows and Linux. Does OSX handle
>> graphics a bit differently?
>> 
>> Did you have the changesets by Panxto & Rik applied as well?
> 
> Yes. I have those applied.  What version of fltk are you using?  I have
> 1.3 installed.

My MXE version has fltk-1.3.1.
Did you compare with gnuplot? (sorry for all those questions)

@Michael: Thanks for the suggestion of align - But first of all I wonder why
my plots changed so much (adversely) after a few changesets, and why Ben got
different plots than me.

Phliip




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/changes-to-graphics-cc-and-subplot-m-tp4655812p4655830.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.