Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m

[Ben Abbott]

On Jul 19, 2013, at 6:30 PM, PhilipNienhuis wrote:

bpabbott wrote

On Jul 19, 2013, at 4:09 PM, PhilipNienhuis wrote:

bpabbott wrote

Using your scripts, the result doesn't look as bad as what you posted.

<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave.png>

Yep; remarkably. I really don't follow why your result is so much better

with the same script.

The plots I posted were the same on Windows and Linux. Does OSX handle

graphics a bit differently?

Did you have the changesets by Panxto & Rik applied as well?

Yes. I have those applied.  What version of fltk are you using?  I have

1.3 installed.

My MXE version has fltk-1.3.1.
Did you compare with gnuplot? (sorry for all those questions)

@Michael: Thanks for the suggestion of align - But first of all I wonder why
my plots changed so much (adversely) after a few changesets, and why Ben got
different plots than me.

Phliip

The script treats gnuplot differently from fltk, so I edited the brugplot.m to remove the special treatment given gnuplot.

 

In either event, since  "align" is on by default default for gnuplot, the result looks better.  I've attached the result using gnupot's Qt terminal.

Ben