[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: project progress
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: project progress |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:11:08 +0200 |
On 2 Sep 2013, at 09:20, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 2 Sep 2013, at 08:53, marco Vassallo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> http://gedeone-gsoc.blogspot.it/2013/09/update-14.html
>
> Looks very nice, thanks!
>
> Though, as I wrote, it would be great to have a line-by-line comparison
> of the implementation in Python and Octave.
>
> If not for this one example, at least for other simpler examples.
>
> c.
Marco,
Could you please start wotking on the tasks I mentioned above, i.e.:
- fem-fenics package release
- side by side comparison of Octave and Python examples
Also, do you have any update on the MTW element implementation or the
GenericMatix::nnz method?
c.
- project progress, c., 2013/09/02
- Re: project progress, c., 2013/09/12
- RE: project progress, marco Vassallo, 2013/09/12
- Re: project progress, c., 2013/09/12
- RE: project progress, marco Vassallo, 2013/09/12
- Re: project progress, c., 2013/09/12