Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core

[Olaf Till]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 07:35:43AM +0100, c. wrote:
> <snip>
> and
> "parcellfun" and "pararrayfun" (and therfore "fsave", "fload" the latter 
> depend upon) 
> from "general".

They would fit into "parallel". The reason Jaroslav kept them in
"general" was to have them under control there in a package maintained
by himself, as he said. It seems this reason doesn't exist
anymore. OTOH, apart from the discussed reorganization of packages,
there seems to be no urgent need to move them --- they don't seem to
need much maintanance, or do they? It could be a disadvantadge for
some if they were moved into "parallel", since "parallel" seems
notorious to be problematic to install on non-standard operating
systems.

Olaf

-- 
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature