[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Feb 2014 18:19:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 04:28:48PM +0100, c. wrote:
>
> On 2 Feb 2014, at 16:11, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > For reasons of speed, they write and read no header, so they don't
> > care for differences in endianness and (potential) differences in
> > float format between different machines. Using them to transfer data
> > between different machines will not necessarily work. For this, there
> > are different functions in "parallel".
>
> OK, so I'll just specify this in the docs before the release.
As I said, I will care for that. Trust me.
> >> After the merge, I'd like to prepare a release of the package if
> >> you're OK with it.
> >
> > Actually I would prefer to do that myself. There will be more to think
> > about for this than merely parcellfun and pararrayfun. I understand
> > you want a new release early (though I don't understand what is the
> > cause of the urgency, doesn't "general" compile for you currently?).
>
> There's no real hurry, the reason I'd like to do this is that
> I teach a course using Octave starting in March and I have to ask
> the sysadmin to install al the stuff I need before then.
> If parcellfun is moved to 'parallel' I'd rather ask him to install
> 'parallel' rather than 'general', but if it's not ready for this
> edition of the course it's not a big deal.
Ok, understood. Think I'll be fast enough.
Olaf
--
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: very small packages - merge into general/miscelleneous or move into core, John hunt, 2014/02/02