Re: Requirements for releasing the STK toolbox as an Octave forge package ?

[c.]

On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:38, address@hidden wrote:

> .. snip ..
> 
>>> Our project is currently hosted on Sourceforge
>>> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/kriging) and we want to keep it that
>>> way, so I'm thinking of something like the LTFAT, which is distributed
>>> as an Octave forge package but hosted on a separate repository.
>> 
>> yes, that should be possible as long as you also clone your repository in
>> Octave Forge.
>> But can you explain why you care to have double distribution?
>> 
> 
> For LTFATs point of view of I would like to explain: It is much easier for
> us to have our own repository, because we can add/remove developers as it
> fits us, without adding more developers to Octave-forge.
> 
> We push our main repository to Octave-forge when we release a package, and
> not any more than that. It is simply a mirror.

that sounds reasonble, is the motivation for STK the same?

> Cheers,
> Peter.

c.