|
From: | Faiz I. Kothari |
Subject: | Re: GSoC 2014 | CUDA |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:24:11 -0800 (PST) |
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 07:29 -0800, Faiz I. Kothari wrote:> I know the licensing issues caused by using CUDA, but Nvidia
> supports OpenCL too, so there shouldn't be any licensing problems.The licensing problems aren't about what interface is used, but
whether there is a free license for it or not. It does not help us if
they have an OpenCL implementation if it's also non-free. As far as I
know, there is no usable free CUDA or OpenCL implementation. Do you
know of one?> Since GPGPU is a very emerging field and simulations are very
> compute intensive tasks,it is therefore very important to have a free implementation of a GPU
runtime.
If you are interested in this problem, please work on that before
you're dazzled by the shiny non-free toys that nvidia et al are
peddling. A gilded cage is still a cage.
- Jordi G. H.
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/GSoC-2014-CUDA-tp4662308p4662312.htmlIf you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:To start a new topic under Octave - Maintainers, email [hidden email]To unsubscribe from GSoC 2014 | CUDA, click here.
NAML
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |