Re: "Official" binary release for Windows

[John Donoghue]

On 03/07/2014 06:08 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:21:01 -0500
> From: "John W. Eaton"<address@hidden>
> To: octave maintainers mailing list<address@hidden>
> Subject: "Official" binary release for Windows
> Message-ID:<address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I'd like to start making the Windows installer available from
> ftp.gnu.org.  Is it ready for that now?  Or are there some significant
> problems that need to be fixed before we should make "official" releases?
>
> jwe

I havent had any issues recently with the build except with gcc.

I had added a readme html file for the install that may want to be 
looked at / modified prior to distribution, depending on what is 
distributed or not.

Would it also make sense to list in it all the packages that are known 
to work and compile in windows ?