Re: [fem-fenics] ufl.m

[Eugenio Gianniti]

On 24 May 2014, at 18:14, Marco Vassallo <address@hidden> wrote:

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Eugenio Gianniti <address@hidden> wrote:

On the patch tracker there is also a new patch correcting the help message [1], and you can find on my blog a post about the function [2].

Hi Eugenio,

thanks for your blog post. The new ufl function does a great job.

You can update some of the examples on the wiki page accordingly, before starting a new part of your project.

Should I also move ufl code to the corresponding m-files of the examples in the package itself?

Eugenio

I think that one of the main feature which is still missing in fem-fenics is the possibility of parallelizing the resolution of a problem. Please give a look at the documentation (Octave and Fenics) and propose some ideas on how we could address this issue. I haven't looked at the problem in deep yet, but I think that you have shown us to be good enough to deal with such an issue. Don't hesitate to ask for help here on the list and also on the FeniCs webmail.

Marco

 

Eugenio

[1] https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8468

[2] http://gsoc2014-eg123.blogspot.it/2014/05/ufl-binding.html