[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:46:01 -0400 |
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:41 -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Could you look at the generated assembly code and see whether the
> "inline" keyword is really needed to get this trivial function to be
> inlined? What compiler optimization flags are you using?
And, of course, what compiler?
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, (continued)
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Rik, 2014/06/16
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, ijourneaux, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, John W. Eaton, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, John W. Eaton, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/17
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/17
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/22
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan, 2014/06/23
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/23
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/23
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/24
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/24
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/18
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/25