[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:34:34 -0400 |
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 08:20 +0530, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Benchmark using the other software will be a good case for comparison. Can
> anyone try and post the result?
You mean Matlab? (Just say its name, it's not forbidden).
A comparison with Matlab won't be very helpful. We know its JIT
compiler is order of magnitudes faster than Octave's.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, (continued)
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/18
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/25
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/25
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/25
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/26
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/18
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Carnë Draug, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Mike Miller, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/24
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/24