octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compilable gui-release revision?


From: Olaf Till
Subject: Re: compilable gui-release revision?
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:06:07 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:13:16PM +0200, Torsten wrote:
> On 23.06.2014 21:59, Torsten wrote:
> > On 23.06.2014 21:46, Mike Miller wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 21:43:08 +0200, Torsten wrote:
> >>> On 23.06.2014 21:19, Dmitri A. Sergatskov wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Olaf Till <address@hidden
> >>>> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>     Can someone tell me a recent revision of gui-release which compiled
> >>>>     for him? (0a66861d8069 from 22/06/2014 15:42 does not compile for 
> >>>> me.)
> >>>>
> >>>>     Olaf
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Seems to work for me:
> >>>> <<<<
> >>>> ...
> >>>> Octave successfully built.  Now choose from the following:
> >>>>
> >>>>    ./run-octave    - to run in place to test before installing
> >>>>    make check      - to run the tests
> >>>>    make install    - to install (PREFIX=/usr/local)
> >>>>
> >>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/d2/home/dima/src/octave'
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/d2/home/dima/src/octave'
> >>>> address@hidden octave]$ hg head
> >>>> changeset:   18854:0a66861d8069
> >>>> branch:      gui-release
> >>>> tag:         tip
> >>>> parent:      18848:b314efd58072
> >>>> user:        Torsten <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >>>> date:        Sun Jun 22 15:42:00 2014 +0200
> >>>> summary:     implementation of search in selection in gui editor (bbug
> >>>> #41196)
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you need to bootstrap and configure due to changes in the ac-files.
> >>
> >> I have not tried building, but rev 0a66861d8069 looks a little
> >> suspicious in that it declares slots in the find_dialog class that are
> >> then conditionally compiled depending on the Qscintilla version. If
> >> the slots are always declared, they should always be defined as well,
> >> and the ifdef be inside the function body if needed.
> >>
> > 
> > Oops, you are completely right. I forgot the ifdefs in the header file.
> > 
> 
> I have fixed this with cset
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/fc0f3b6c37a9
> 
> Torsten

Thanks for the answers, probably the latter was indeed the problem for
me, since I got errors concerning undefined references
`find_dialog::handle_sel_search_changed(int)' and
`find_dialog::handle_selection_changed(bool)'. With the fix, it
compiles. (I also would have investigated, seeing it worked for
others, but now it's not necessary anymore.)

Thanks, Olaf

-- 
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]