[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries
From: |
Michael C. Grant |
Subject: |
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:22:20 +0000 |
Oh, my primary development platform is OSX, certainly, and I can build there
for myself.
But I have some C code here, so I like to do testing on Linux and Windows as
well. That's where things get messy.
On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:20 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 22:13, Michael C. Grant <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I know I'm a bit late to this party, but it would be very helpful for me to
>> have builds of gui-release and/or default, since these have functionality
>> not yet present in stable, and I'd like to be able to test my code against
>> that functionality.
>
> I don't think there is need to distribute unstable binaries for this.
> You can build Octave from source if you want to test the latest
> functionalities for yourself.
> IIRC you are using OSX? If needed I can share a modified MacPorts port that
> builds the latest
> "@" bookmark in the mercurial repo.
>
> c.
Re: Distributing unstable Windows binaries, magnesj, 2014/07/21