[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:47:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0 |
On 11/24/2014 03:52 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
I also like:
5) Stick with what we have today, compile all Fortran files with
$(F77) as if they were valid F77, and deal with problems in Jaroslav's
code if any bugs are ever encountered and reported.
Yes, this seems reasonable to me.
As I recall, the reason for editing the list during bootstrap is to
avoid using g77 on systems that still have it installed, but for which
system libraries like lapack have been compiled with gfortran. Cases
like that lead to linking problems, or mixing of calling conventions for
some functions (complex arguments/return values, I think).
I agree with Mike that specifying our own list is the wrong thing to do.
jwe
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, (continued)
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/11/24
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Mike Miller, 2014/11/24
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/11/24
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Mike Miller, 2014/11/24
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/11/24
- Re: Default F77 is g77, Rik, 2014/11/24
- Re: Default F77 is g77, John W. Eaton, 2014/11/24
- Re: Default F77 is g77, John W. Eaton, 2014/11/24
- Re: Default F77 is g77, Rik, 2014/11/24
- Re: Default F77 is g77, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/11/24
- Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave,
John W. Eaton <=
Re: F77 vs. F90 in Octave, Michael Godfrey, 2014/11/24