|
From: | Richard Crozier |
Subject: | Re: replace symbolic package on Octave-Forge |
Date: | Thu, 08 Jan 2015 07:57:11 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
On 07/01/15 23:13, Colin Macdonald wrote:
On 07/01/15 22:06, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:Is there anything that could be done to convince you to try Mercurial? It's helpful to have a single VCS for Octave, and Mercurial is what we use for Octave itself.I'll think about it. (-) My "other upstream" (SymPy) uses git. (-) I'm not sure I can handle the mental load of working with both (I use git for other projects). (+) Maybe being on hg attracts extra help from Octave community. (+) I do like the more patch-based philosophy of hg. Perhaps I could experiment a bit with git-hg or hg-git. Colin
Having had to learn both Mercurial and Git, all I can say is, try mercurial, you'll never look back. It's like Git, but designed for humans. The 'mental load' you refer to is a Git problem.
Richard -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |