Re: No

[Michael Godfrey]

On 01/30/2015 09:24 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 08:13 PM, Michael Godfrey wrote:
> > On 01/30/2015 08:59 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
> > > If the Windows code goes into the default branch at the onset and is
> > > in a constant flux it could mean a higher version release rate if you
> > > want people with Windows access to test. But that means everything in
> > > default branch needs to be robust when there could be other
> > > development things going on.
> > Another benefit of no branches.
>
> The drawback is the reluctance to make significant and good changes 
> when warranted.
>
> Dan 
Correct. But the advantage is a reliable system which can be developed 
without continuing
regressions and failures. Recall that "significant and good" is not the 
same as correct at the
system level.