Re: Package for level-set-based shape optimisation

[Daniel Kraft]

Hi!

On 11.03.2015 18:30, Nir Krakauer wrote:
> My suggestion would be to keep it within the level-set package for now.​
> You could sort the functions into different categories like in the
> Statistics package [1] to make it easier for users to understand the
> relationship between them.
> 
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/statistics/ci/default/tree/INDEX

Yes, I'm already doing that for level-set and would definitely add the
shape optimisation stuff to a separate category.  That makes totally sense.

This solution would also be the easiest for me with respect to
administration.  I wouldn't need to get a new approval to publish my
code from the university and wouldn't need to set up a new repository
and all that.

Yours,
Daniel

-- 
http://www.domob.eu/
OpenPGP: 1142 850E 6DFF 65BA 63D6  88A8 B249 2AC4 A733 0737
Namecoin: id/domob -> https://nameid.org/?name=domob
--
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Hea-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Mon-Pri

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature