[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bring Pytave into core
From: |
Carlo De Falco |
Subject: |
Re: Bring Pytave into core |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Apr 2015 16:31:42 +0000 |
On 6 Apr 2015, at 18:11, Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I support the idea too! I often communicate between Octave and Python,
> but all tools out there put Octave as a slave of python. I would love
> two-way communication.
>
I never used Pytave myself, so forgive me if I got a wrong impression,
but from Pytave description on launchpad it seems its purpose is:
"enabling existing m-files (Matlab scripts) for numerical calculations to be
used from Python."
this does not really sound like two-way communication but yet another way to
allow
Python users to access Octave features.
If so what is the benefit of this for Octave users/developers?
I think something like the "py" interface suggested by mike would be much
more beneficial and worth working on.
c.
- Bring Pytave into core, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2015/04/06
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Mike Miller, 2015/04/06
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Julien Bect, 2015/04/06
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2015/04/06
- Re: Bring Pytave into core,
Carlo De Falco <=
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2015/04/06
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, John W. Eaton, 2015/04/08
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Colin Macdonald, 2015/04/09
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2015/04/09
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Mike Miller, 2015/04/09
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Mike Miller, 2015/04/14
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Jesús Zazueta, 2015/04/14
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Carlo De Falco, 2015/04/14
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Tomasz Ożański, 2015/04/28
- Re: Bring Pytave into core, Mike Miller, 2015/04/29