[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Windows package [WAS: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages]
From: |
Philip Nienhuis |
Subject: |
Windows package [WAS: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages] |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 04:55:44 -0700 (PDT) |
John Donoghue-2 wrote
> On 04/10/2015 09:11 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 16:05:15 -0400, JohnD wrote:
>>> I just tried installing all of packages that currently in the active
>>> list on octave forge in Windows using octave 4.0.0 rc2 (32 bit)
>>> This is trying to install on the windows machine, not attempting cross
>>> compile, using what is available as the 'current' package on
>>> octave-forge.
>>> Heres the following results:
>> So do you intend to drop or patch the remaining failing packages in
>> build_packages.m (dicom, odepkg, windows) if no fixed releases are made
>> before the official 4.0 Windows binary is built?
>>
>> Thanks for working on this,
>>
> Since there are patches available for most, I could patch most of them
> in mxe.
>
> The windows package may be a different story, as even patched, it
> currently says it has errors.
>
> But, even if patched in in mxe, anyone who tries installing from octave
> forge will get failures.
More info is in a related bug report #44180.
Short recap:
In Octave compiled for 32-bit, a slightly patched Windows package may give
some COM errors (or maybe even just one) but otherwise seems to work fine.
That is, spreadsheet I/O test scripts in the io package that invoke
COM/ActiveX run w/o any issues.
For 64-bit Octave (--enable-windows-64 or--enable-64 configure options in
MXE) the patched windows package will install fine but doesn't work and even
crashes Octave hard.
Avinoam patched the package along the lines I sketched (to arrive at what I
use myself); I think that patched windows package version could be included
in the MXE installer as long as the latter is built without the
--enable-windows-64 configure option.
Philip
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Forge-Octave-4-0-call-for-packages-tp4669204p4669762.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, (continued)
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/13
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2015/04/10
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Julien Bect, 2015/04/11
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Julien Bect, 2015/04/11
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Oliver Heimlich, 2015/04/11
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Oliver Heimlich, 2015/04/11
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Julien Bect, 2015/04/11
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Julien Bect, 2015/04/17
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Mike Miller, 2015/04/10
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, John Donoghue, 2015/04/10
- Windows package [WAS: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages],
Philip Nienhuis <=
Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, tmacchant, 2015/04/07
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/07
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2015/04/07
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, tmacchant, 2015/04/07
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2015/04/07
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Julien Bect, 2015/04/08
- Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2015/04/08
Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Carlo de Falco, 2015/04/07
Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Jacopo Corno, 2015/04/08
Re: Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2015/04/08