Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages

[Oliver Heimlich]

On 11.04.2015 20:56, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
> John Donoghue-2 wrote
> > On 04/11/2015 12:00 PM,
>
> > octave-maintainers-request@
>
> >   wrote:
> > > Why would there be differences between 32 and 64 bit Windows as regards
> > > OF-packages compatibility with 32-bit Octave?
> > >
> > > I'd rather expect quite a few differences between 32- and 64-bit versions
> > > of
> > > Octave itself (obviously the latter will only run on Win64).
> > >
> > > Philip
> >
> > There are some differences, whether from the fact of being Win32 vs
> > Win64 or not?
>
> Not sure I follow :-)
> AFAIK 32-bit Windows applications should run identically whether in 32- or
> 64 bit Windows.

On the differences detected by JohnD:

control: This is OpenBLAS vs ReferenceBLAS
image: Can you provide the log?
level-set: rc2 vs rc3
optics: Can you provide the log?
queueing: rc2 vs rc3
signal: Maybe a problem with my installation when calling temporary 
function files.

Also I believe that some tests are non-deterministic.