|
From: | Oliver Heimlich |
Subject: | Re: [Octave Forge] Octave 4.0 call for packages |
Date: | Sat, 11 Apr 2015 22:32:41 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 |
On 11.04.2015 20:56, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
John Donoghue-2 wroteOn 04/11/2015 12:00 PM,octave-maintainers-request@wrote:Why would there be differences between 32 and 64 bit Windows as regards OF-packages compatibility with 32-bit Octave? I'd rather expect quite a few differences between 32- and 64-bit versions of Octave itself (obviously the latter will only run on Win64). PhilipThere are some differences, whether from the fact of being Win32 vs Win64 or not?Not sure I follow :-) AFAIK 32-bit Windows applications should run identically whether in 32- or 64 bit Windows.
On the differences detected by JohnD: control: This is OpenBLAS vs ReferenceBLAS image: Can you provide the log? level-set: rc2 vs rc3 optics: Can you provide the log? queueing: rc2 vs rc3signal: Maybe a problem with my installation when calling temporary function files.
Also I believe that some tests are non-deterministic.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |