octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How compatible does it have to be?


From: Pantxo Diribarne
Subject: Re: How compatible does it have to be?
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:48:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Le 14/04/2015 02:47, Daniel a écrit :
If I write a new function for a package, how comatible does it have to be with matlab?

For example, is the following difference considered a "bug"?


In matlab:

        >> T=maketform('affine',[.5 0 0; .5 2 0; 0 0 1]);
        tformfwd([10 20],T)

        ans =

            15    40

        >> tformfwd(T,[10 20])

        ans =

            15    40

In octave:
        octave:13> T=maketform('affine',[.5 0 0;.5 2 0;0 0 1]);
        octave:14> tformfwd([10 20],T)
        error: tformfwd: expect a transform structure as first argument


Daniel
Hi,

The fact the Matlab accepts argument of tformfwd in any order is not documented and may change in the future, so I would stick to the properly documented interface and not consider this a bug. Lets keep being more rigorous than they are :-)

Pantxo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]