[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
laguerre.m functions in specfun package
From: |
Philip Nienhuis |
Subject: |
laguerre.m functions in specfun package |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2015 07:56:17 -0700 (PDT) |
After Colin has tidied up a bit in the OF specfun package, I'm planning to
make a new release of it.
The package in the mercurial repo contains two laguerre.m functions, one in
inst/, the other in devel/
The latter looks to be a bit more elaborate (it contains a demo and perhaps
more aptly named variables), to compensate for that it is lacking a bit in
coding style and lacks the one comment line that was present in the original
(?) one in inst/.
So, any advice about which laguerre.m to retain?
If no one reacts within a few days I'll polish op the laguerre.m in devel/
and make a new specfun release.
Philip
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/laguerre-m-functions-in-specfun-package-tp4670060.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- laguerre.m functions in specfun package,
Philip Nienhuis <=
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/25
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Philip Nienhuis, 2015/04/25
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Carnë Draug, 2015/04/28
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2015/04/29
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Colin Macdonald, 2015/04/29
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2015/04/29
- Re: laguerre.m functions in specfun package, Colin Macdonald, 2015/04/29
- specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package], Philip Nienhuis, 2015/04/29
- Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package], Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2015/04/29
- Re: specfun release ? [WAS: laguerre.m functions in specfun package], Philip Nienhuis, 2015/04/29