octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FYI:gcc-4.9.3


From: Philip Nienhuis
Subject: RE: FYI:gcc-4.9.3
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:58:03 -0700 (PDT)

JohnD wrote
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: JohnD [mailto:

> john.david.donoghue@

> ]
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 10:59 AM
>> To: 

> octave-maintainers@

>> Cc: 

> address@hidden

>> Subject: RE: FYI:gcc-4.9.3
>> 
>> >
>> > Message: 2
>> > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:19:09 +0900 (JST)
>> > From: "

> address@hidden

> " <

> address@hidden

> >
>> > To: "

> maintainers@

> " <

> maintainers@

> >
>> > Subject: FYI:gcc-4.9.3
>> > Message-ID: <

> address@hidden

>>
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> >
>> > gcc-4.9.3 is released on June 28.
>> > On cygwin ML, there is a request to update version of gcc from 4.9.2
>> > to
>> 4.9.3.
>> >
>> > http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/GCC-upgrade-to-4-9-3-version-reque
>> > st-
>> > td119316.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Is the mxe-octave related?
>> >
>> > Tatsuro
>> >
>> 
>> Perhaps that the issue seen with the 64 bit mingw build - I am trying to
> build a
>> 4.9.3 version now so will see if it works
>> 
> 
> 4.9.3 doesn't fix the issues with Windows 64 native compiled packages

Ever since it turned out that returning to 4.9.2 again broke 64-bit
mkoctfile on Windows I make my MXE builds using gcc-5.1.0 - since then I
never had problem with building packages on the Windows side (keeping
fingers crossed, of course).

Philip




--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/FYI-gcc-4-9-3-tp4671271p4671304.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]