[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?
|
From: |
Sebastian Schöps |
|
Subject: |
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Sep 2015 23:37:26 -0700 (PDT) |
Michael Barnes wrote
> I just got asked this question at a computer vision conference. Does
> anyone have any benchmark examples I can quote?
Yet another comment: an obvious reason why Octave is often as fast as Matlab
is that both rely on the same numerical libraries (e.g. ARPACK, SuiteSparse
etc). Consequently, benchmarking x=A\b would not make much sense.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Speed-of-Ocave-vs-Matlab-tp4672488p4672493.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, (continued)
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Markus Bergholz, 2015/09/07
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?,
Sebastian Schöps <=
Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Alexander Barth, 2015/09/08
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Carlo De Falco, 2015/09/08
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Alexander Barth, 2015/09/08
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Chechu Garguez, 2015/09/08
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Alexander Barth, 2015/09/08
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, chechu, 2015/09/09
- Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?, Alexander Barth, 2015/09/09