Re: Speed of Ocave vs Matlab?

[Richard Crozier]

On 08/09/15 22:26, Michael Godfrey wrote:
> This seems to be true. But, it should be added that the implementation is
> very incomplete, and does not work on recent versions of llvm. It is
> likely that it could be made to work better. Or, does anyone have a better
> idea for a JIT?

There's been a talk on the bug tracker of using the experimental gcc-jit:

https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?8395

Since Octave mostly uses gcc to compile this would seem like an 
interesting direction to go. The author of gcc-jit also seems keen to 
disseminate his work so might help Octave develop this.

Richard

--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.