[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS Binary
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS Binary |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:24:38 +0100 |
On 10 Nov 2015, at 15:59, Marius Schamschula <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:18 AM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10 Nov 2015, at 14:19, Marius Schamschula <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> The upstream licenses are the same.
>> ok, so what you suggest is get the list of packages from homebrew the use
>> macports to read the license of each package?
>> sounds like a lot of work, doesn't it?
>> c.
>>
>
> What I’m saying is that Homebrew formulas do not specify the license, whereas
> MacPorts Portfiles have a required field that does.
> You are certainly welcome to reinvent the wheel.
I am not sure I understand what you are actually proposing to do, can you
explain the steps you suggest to follow?
> Marius
c.
- Mac OS Binary, Sebastian Schöps, 2015/11/09
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, c., 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Marius Schamschula, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary,
c. <=
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Alexander Hansen, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Sebastian Schöps, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Carlo De Falco, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Eugenio Gianniti, 2015/11/10
- Re: Mac OS Binary, Eugenio Gianniti, 2015/11/10
Re: Mac OS Binary, Daniel J Sebald, 2015/11/10
Re: Mac OS Binary, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2015/11/12