Re: New hash function

[John W. Eaton]

On 12/16/2015 03:56 PM, Kai Torben Ohlhus wrote:

> Okay then I got it slightly wrong with the DLD. The code does only
> depend on the GNULIB, that is included anyway. I expanded the
> implementation of D. Bateman very cheaply, as the GNULIB grew a lot
> according to cryptographic hash functions.
>
> I push a cset in a minute. Thanks for acknowledging.

Thanks.

It doesn't matter much in this case, but how did you move the file?  I 
think it helps hg to track changes across a file renaming if you use "hg 
rename".

jwe