[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt
From: |
John Swensen |
Subject: |
Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:15:51 -0800 |
> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Michael Godfrey <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/11/2016 05:52 PM, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
>> Also I disagree: This does not render well in my browser. The MathJax
>> numbers use a different font with a different weight compared to the
>> surrounding text, which looks very bad.
>>
>> Oliver
> What browser are you using? On what system?
>
>
MathJax looks bad in Google Chrome on OSX unless I right click and go choose
Math Settings-Math Renderer and select SVG as the renderer. The HTML-CSS,
Common HTML (which was the default), and Fast HTML all look really bad for me.
My test equations was:
$\dot{x}(t) = A(t) x(t) + B(t) u(t) \\ y(t) = C(t) x(t)$
In the poor cases, the dot for the derivative was too low and smashed into the
x and the spacing for dependent variables and spacing between equation
components seemed “off” compared to vanilla pdflatex. After choosing the SVG
renderer, I couldn’t see a difference between the LaTeX output from LaTeXit!
and from MathJax
John S.
Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, John W. Eaton, 2016/01/12
Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Pantxo, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, George Apostolopoulos, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Pantxo, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Michael Godfrey, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Daniel J Sebald, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Michael Godfrey, 2016/01/12
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Pantxo, 2016/01/13
- Re: Latex interpreter via Mathjax + Qt, Michael Godfrey, 2016/01/13