octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: svds test on 4.0.1-rc3


From: Rik
Subject: Re: svds test on 4.0.1-rc3
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 09:23:50 -0800

On 01/19/2016 09:00 AM, address@hidden wrote:
Subject:
RE: 4.0.1-rc3 candidate on Windows (was Re: 4.0.1-rc2 candidate)
From:
"JohnD" <address@hidden>
Date:
01/19/2016 08:36 AM
To:
<address@hidden>
List-Post:
<mailto:address@hidden>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Precedence:
list
MIME-Version:
1.0
References:
<address@hidden> <address@hidden>
In-Reply-To:
<address@hidden>
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message:
2

Running just __run_test_suite__ in windows with rc3:

  PASS     12955
  FAIL         1
  XFAIL       27
  SKIPPED     54


The failed test:
>>>>> processing
C:\Octave\Octave-4.0.1-rc3\share\octave\4.0.1-rc3\m\sparse\svds.m
***** testif HAVE_ARPACK, HAVE_UMFPACK
 [u2,s2,v2,flag] = svds (A,k,0,opts);
 s2 = diag (s2);
 assert (flag, !1);
 tol = 10 * eps() * norm(s2, 1);
 assert (s2, s(k:-1:1), tol);

!!!!! test failed
ASSERT errors for:  assert (s2,s (k:-1:1),tol)

  Location  |  Observed  |  Expected  |  Reason
     .          O(6x1)       E(7x1)      Dimensions don't match






A fix for the irreproducibility of the svds tests is in cset 20999:73f62b4bb533.  I wasn't 100% certain that this would not affect results in the field so I committed it to default rather than stable.  Marco Caliari is the author and if he has confidence that this won't interfere with existing code then we could easily backport the changeset.

--Rik


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]