[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
From: |
Sebastian Schöps |
Subject: |
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:51:20 -0800 (PST) |
Julien Bect-2 wrote
> Le 12/02/2016 16:19, Sebastian Schöps a écrit :
>> Julien Bect-2 wrote
>>> >In my opinion this should be considered as a bug in Matlab (I have
>>> >tested on Matlab R2012a and R2015a, I haven't access to R2015b right
>>> >now)... but I would like to hear what others think.
>> Can you give a code snippet to test? (I am running the prerelease of
>> R2016a).
>
> Sure. See attachment.
Here we go:
>> version
ans =
9.0.0.307022 (R2016a) Prerelease
>> script_test
x =
A object: 3-by-4-by-5
ans =
2
>>
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Matlab-compatibility-or-not-Matlab-compatibility-tp4674770p4674783.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Julien Bect, 2016/02/12
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Sebastian Schöps, 2016/02/12
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Julien Bect, 2016/02/12
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility,
Sebastian Schöps <=
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Julien Bect, 2016/02/15
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Julien Bect, 2016/02/16
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/02/16
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Julien Bect, 2016/02/17
- Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility, Nicholas Jankowski, 2016/02/17