|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: C++11 now default? |
Date: | Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:33:47 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.5.0 |
On 02/22/2016 12:25 PM, Rik wrote:
We could always do as jwe suggested, albeit reluctantly, and introduce UNIQUE_PTR which uses a test in configure to determine whether std::unique_ptr or std::auto_ptr is available.
Another possibility would be (in the footsteps of gnulib, or perhaps even as part of gnulib) we could define our own <memory> header that includes the system header and then provides a replacement unique_ptr class that has the proper semantics. As I understand it, auto_ptr and unique_ptr are not exactly the same.
jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |