octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4


From: John Donoghue
Subject: Re: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:41:27 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

On 03/11/2016 09:20 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
On 03/11/2016 07:13 AM, JohnD wrote:

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:24:13 -0800
From: Rik <address@hidden>
To: Octave-Maintainers <address@hidden>, "John W. Eaton"
    <address@hidden>
Subject: Testing octave-4.0.1-rc4
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

jwe,

I tested the new tarball at ftp://alpha.gnu.org.  As expected for a
vanilla
Linux system, it passed all tests and all build configurations including
in-tree, out-of-tree builds, and 'make install' followed by
__run_test_suite__.

--Rik


Compiling in mxe-octave with new tarball and running win7:

   PASS     13020
   FAIL         0
   XFAIL       27
   SKIPPED     54

I saw this the first time I tried mxe-octave:

[build]    nsis
[done]     nsis
generating installer script...
generating installer...
*** Error in `i686-w64-mingw32-makensis': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x0000000001f3e6d0 *** bash: line 1: 13395 Aborted i686-w64-mingw32-makensis /scratch/jwe/mxe-octave/dist/octave.nsi > /scratch/jwe/mxe-octave/dist/nsis.log /scratch/jwe/mxe-octave/binary-dist-rules.mk:185: recipe for target 'octave-4.0.1-rc4-installer.exe' failed
make: *** [octave-4.0.1-rc4-installer.exe] Error 134

I used

  ./configure --enable-binary-packages --enable-devel-tools
  make JOBS=10
  make binary-dist-files zip-dist nsis-installer

After the failure, I tried again with just

  make nsis-installer

and it seems to have worked.  Odd.

Anyway, testing now, and if my build looks OK I'll upload it to alpha.gnu.org.

Unless there are any objections, I think this should become 4.0.1 (only changing the version number).

jwe



I haven't seen the issue, however I don't usually specify jobs.

There has been a couple of other reports over the months where a random package in mxe-octave has failed to build - however either rerunning make, or make JOBS=1 works fine

This doesnt look like that kind of issue though.

4.0.1 gets my vote!





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]